Seqlo Automations · AI Workflow Orchestration
Production workflows in Make and the Claude API. I work directly with the companies that run the process, and I build white-label under agency brands. Flat fee against a fixed scope, documented so your people can support it.
Send me a scopeOne build at a time. I respond within one business day with a quote and availability.
What I build
Most of these projects start the same way. Someone handles a repetitive task by hand, and it takes real judgment to do it right. They're good at it, so nobody has questioned what it costs.
I take the process apart and separate the parts that actually need a person. Everything else gets built to run on its own. What comes out the other end is whatever you need. Sometimes that's a completed file. Sometimes it's an alert routed to three people. Often it's both.
This covers claims files, loan applications, disclosures and compliance submissions. The documents come in and the system pulls out what matters. It checks that against your rules and hands back a summary with anything unusual marked for review.
A form or an inbox becomes a structured record and lands with the right person, with a first response already drafted. Nothing gets re-keyed and nothing sits unclaimed for three days.
Your numbers already live across four or five systems. Nobody has to rebuild the same report every month. It assembles on a schedule in your format and goes out without being asked.
Applications, submissions and leads get measured against your criteria and ranked. The written reasoning comes attached, so a person can defend the call to a client or an auditor.
Anything leaving your organization gets read against your own standards first. One caught error usually covers what the build cost you.
If what you have in mind isn't on that list, it's still worth a conversation. Most of what I build is the same set of parts arranged differently.
What I need from you is one process, the rules your people apply to it, and access to whatever systems it touches. You supply the domain knowledge and I build the system. Prior industry experience is not required.
Reference build
I built this for a company I can't name. The report it produces used to be done by hand, starting at $500 with a two to four week turnaround. Now a document comes in and a finished branded PDF goes out by email. Nobody touches it from intake to delivery.
A document comes in and a confirmation email goes out. The system reads it and writes back a long structured critique, with corrections, a map and current market data. All of that renders to a branded PDF and goes out by email.
Nine modules on one scenario. The form comes in, we count the words, two model calls run back to back, the output assembles into HTML, that renders to a PDF, and it goes out by email.
It worked. Completed reports went out fully automated. Then the reports got deeper, and one came back cut off mid-sentence with everything after it gone.
Make's native Anthropic connector cuts off around forty seconds. So I moved to the generic HTTP module, which bought us three hundred. The problem was that the deeper I pushed the output, the longer the model reasoned before it wrote anything, and you can spend all of your time reasoning and leave no room for output.
No plan or upgrade raises that limit. If you can't fix it by making it faster, you have to stop waiting on it.
Make.com · Claude API · custom HTML/CSS document template
Four minutes, unedited. Where it broke, why no plan fixes it, and what nine modules became.
I'll put up another video on what happens when this breaks, because error handling on a split build is its own problem. That layer is where most of the engineering time goes, and it's the part I treat as the job.
How engagements work
Reduced for a limited time. I'm building out public case studies, so the Pilot is running below its normal fee in exchange for permission to write up the build and a short testimonial once it's live.
Paid discovery that ships running code. I map the process end to end, write the build spec, and validate every integration against your real endpoints. Then I build one working workflow so you can see how I work before committing to the rest. This step is why my builds don't stall.
It credits in full against a build started within sixty days. If you go ahead, discovery costs you nothing.
And if automation isn't your answer, you don't pay for it. The first two days are process mapping and feasibility. If I conclude the bottleneck is somewhere else, I stop there, put what I found in writing, and refund the fee in full. You keep the write-up.
Connected workflows delivered as one system. Error handling and failure-state routing get specified up front. You get written handover documentation and thirty days of post-launch support. Payment runs forty percent to start, thirty at the midpoint, thirty on acceptance. If the system doesn't do what the scope says it does, the final milestone isn't owed and you keep the documentation.
Monitoring, fixes, and up to eight hours a quarter absorbing platform and API changes. The upper tier includes one new workflow per quarter of up to ten modules. Optional, and never a condition of the build.
Flat fees against fixed scope, not hourly. You evaluate what gets delivered. Compressed timelines carry a rush fee, quoted before you commit.
For agencies
Everything above works the same way under your brand. You sold the work and you don't have the builder. I do that part.
A typical engagement runs four to eight weeks. The flat fee runs from $12,000 to $25,000, depending on how much of the process I take on and what happens when it fails. Agencies running three or more builds a year get partner pricing. What you charge on top of that is your business.
Why one person
I take on one project at a time, which is why the timeline is firm. You're talking directly to the engineer rather than an account manager relaying to a contractor.
If you need parallel capacity I'll say so upfront instead of stacking you behind four other clients. If a scope is outside what I can do well, you'll hear that on the first call rather than three weeks in.
