Seqlo Automations — AI Workflow Orchestration

For agencies

Overflow build capacity, invisible to your client

You sold the work, but you don't have the builder. That is the problem I solve.

You close the deal and set your price. I never speak to your client unless you want me on the call.
You brief me on scope and timeline. I come back within a day with a fixed fee and a delivery date, or I tell you it is not a fit.
I build it and document it under your brand. Architecture notes, runbook, failure states, handover.
You deliver it and keep the relationship. Optional ongoing support, still under your name.

Typical engagement is a three to six workflow system, four to six weeks, $9,500 to $14,000 flat. What you charge on top of that is your business.

Reference build

A three-stage Claude pipeline that returns a finished PDF with no human in it

I built the document generation pipeline behind LaunchQuack. It replaces a professional review that specialists produced by hand, at $500 to $2,000 a time, on a two to six week turnaround.

What it does

An intake form fires a webhook. Three Claude calls run in sequence, each carrying its own purpose-built system prompt of several thousand words. The three outputs assemble into a styled HTML document, render to a branded PDF through a third-party API, and go out by email. Form submission to delivered document, unattended.

The parts that were hard

Voice consistency across stateless calls. Three separate API calls with no shared memory have to read as a single consistent voice. The voice specification is replicated verbatim and versioned across all three prompts.
Making the model count before it concludes. A structured self-verification pass writes a zone-by-zone inventory into a non-rendering comment before any visible output. The verdict follows the counts instead of the impression.
Getting arbitrary generated HTML through a strict-validation render API. Escaping, character encoding, schema shape, and enum casing. Four separate failure modes, each one silent in a different way.

Make.com · Claude API · Typeform · Doppio · Gmail · custom HTML/CSS document template

3chained model calls, one continuous voice

15+page branded PDF, generated and delivered

0humans between submission and inbox

Most AI projects die between the demo and production. They die on encoding, schema validation, and failure states, not on the model. I treat those as the job.

What I build

If someone on your team does it the same way every week, it can usually run without them

Most projects start the same way. Somebody is doing repetitive work that takes real judgment, they are doing it well, and nobody has questioned what it costs because there was never another option.

I take the process apart, work out which parts actually need a person, and build the rest so it runs on its own. What comes out the far end is whatever you need it to be, whether that is a finished document, an updated record, a routed request, or a message to the one person who should see it.

Reading and checking paperwork

Claims files, loan applications, disclosures, compliance submissions, vendor contracts. The documents come in, the system pulls out what matters, checks it against your rules, and hands back a summary with anything unusual marked for review.

Intake and routing

A form or an inbox becomes a structured record, lands with the right person, and arrives with a first response already drafted. Nothing gets re-keyed and nothing sits unclaimed for three days.

Reporting that builds itself

Your numbers already live across four or five systems. Instead of someone rebuilding the same report every month, it assembles on a schedule, in your format, and goes out without being asked.

Scoring and recommendation

Applications, submissions and leads get measured against your criteria and ranked, with the written reasoning attached so a person can defend the call to a client or an auditor.

Quality checks before something ships

Anything leaving your organization gets read against your own standards first. This is the one that pays for itself the first time it catches something.

If what you have in mind is not on that list, it is still worth a conversation. Most of what I build is the same set of parts arranged differently and pointed at a different problem.

What I need from you is one process, the rules your people apply to it, and access to whatever systems it touches. You bring the domain knowledge and I build the machine that runs it. Having worked in your industry before matters a lot less than most people expect.

How engagements work

Three ways in

Workflow Teardown$1,500 – $2,500

Paid discovery. I map the process end to end, write the build spec, validate the integrations against the real endpoints, and ship one working workflow. The fee credits in full against the build if you go ahead. This step is why my builds do not stall.

Core System Build$9,500 – $14,000

Three to six connected workflows delivered as one system, in four to six weeks. Error handling and failure-state routing specified, written handover documentation, thirty days of post-launch support. Fifty percent to start, fifty percent on acceptance. If the system does not do what the scope says it does, the final milestone is not owed and you keep the documentation.

Care Plan$1,200 – $2,500 / mo

Monitoring, fixes, platform and API changes absorbed, and one new workflow per quarter. Optional, and never a condition of the build.

Flat fees against fixed scope, not hourly. You evaluate what gets delivered.

Why one person

One project at a time

I take on one project at a time, which is why the timeline is firm. You are talking directly to the engineer rather than an account manager relaying to a contractor.

If you need parallel capacity I will say so upfront instead of stacking you behind four other clients. If a scope is outside what I can do well, I will tell you that on the first call rather than three weeks in.

Based in Florida. Seqlo Automations LLC.